1)
Which of Stephen Stockwell's books are in the Griffith library?
-
Stockwell, S., 1954 2005, Political campaign strategy: doing democracy in the 21st century,Australian
Scholarly Publishing, Melbourne.
2)
Cite three academic books that might provide useful material for an essay about
Jean Luc Godard's Alphaville.
On which campuses do they reside?
- Morrey,
D. 2005, Jean-Luc Godard, Manchester
University Press, Manchester. (Available at Nathan Campus.
-MacCabe,
C. & Godard, J.L., 1930 1980, Godard;
images, sounds, politics, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
(Available at South Bank and Nathan Campus.)
-Brody,
R., 1958 2008, Everything is cinema:
the working life of Jean-Luc Godard, Metropolitan Books, New York.
(Available at Nathan and South Bank Campus
3)
What is a book that will assist you to find out
about possible research methods to explore social media?
-Media
research methods; measuring audiences, reactions and impact.
-Gunter,
B. & Sage Publications, i. 2000, Media
research methods: measuring audiences, reactions and impact, SAGE,
London.
4)
Stephen
Stockwell writes about politics and the media, particularly in Australia. What
database would you use to find his first academic article about Brisbane in a
national journal? What year?
Database;
InformitArticle Reference;
Stockwell, S. 2007, "Alternative Media in Brisbane: 1965-1985", Queensland Review, vol. 14, no. 1,
pp. 75-87.
5) What is the latest medical thinking
about internet addiction? What data base did you use?
6)
What are IT engineers thinking about surveillance cameras? Identify a theme you
could write an say about and cite three papers that would be useful?
(Task 2)
BRB (be
right back) Friendster?
Like many social networking communities
that have been wiped off the charts with the popularity and the rise of new social media trends,
Friendster, once popular in 2002 (predominantly) in Asia has crumpled in recent
times just like Myspace. Friendster at its peak had 1.5 million users, which at the time was a great number for people in the early millenia and was mainly used for communication and social networking purposes. Although it is argued that Friendster (MOL) is a
survivor of the dot.com boom (Sarah Mishkin 2012), it has become even more
unfrequently used as the years have passed and social media communities such as
Facebook, Instagram and Twitter have surpassed the once popular networking
site. However bleak it may look for the social networking organisation the CEO
and co-founder of MOL (Friendster) referred to in Mishkin’s article as Mr
Banagh laments confidently that 'Yeah, but it's still strong in Asia'
(Mishkin, 2012.)
Although there is
still hope for the social networking site with its rival Facebook interested in
buying shares in the privately owned company, it is very likely that, the once
front runner and pioneer of social networking which existed before Myspace and
Facebook, is unknown to younger internet users (Kate Askew 2011.) Is Friendster
another victim of Web 2.0? Stay tuned.
I personally have
not used Friendster and have never had a Friendster account. However, it is
easy to join parallels and see similarities between the demise of Friendster
and other once popular networking sites such as Myspace. I was once a Myspace
user before I had Facebook and used Myspace at the height of its popularity. I
personally can not predict what will be cool after Facebook has suffered the
churn of technology, maybe I will leave that up to Web 3.0 to decide?
Askew, K. 2011, Pushing the boundaries of
dotcom valuations, Sydney, N.S.W., Australia, Sydney, N.S.W.
Mishkin, S. 2012, "How Malaysians online are
staying best Friendsters for ever", FT.com, , pp. n/
(Task 3)
Revision of Required Weekly Readings/Tutorial
Discussion;
Sue Halpern; Mind Control and The Internet.
This week’s tutorial and weekly article shed some
light on an interesting view of how individuals can and are being controlled
and manipulated by the internet. As a result of this reading, these questions
were raised as debate and discussion;
How might the internet be controlling
our minds?
As discussed in Halpern’s article,
there are many techniques used by organisations that are implemented to collect
user’s personal information (one technique which is referred to in the article
as ‘data mining’.) A lot of companies (such as Google) rely on this collected
information for internet advertising purposes. The article further discusses
that companies can profile their desired audience on the internet by
categorising users via what the user/s search on the internet, companies are
doing this in the quest to find their ideal consumers to purchase their
products, utilising key words that the user has typed previously to target
demographics. Furthermore, Halpern argues that Google use similar invasive data
mining techniques to profile it’s users to accommodate the users pre-existing
views and ideologies. This is concerning as described by Halpern, as it leaves
little room for debate, innovation and a lack of challenging and thought
provoking ideas when it comes to individual users using the internet. It can be
argued that by feeding the masses with same thought ideologies and not leaving
room for education on new topics and ideas, that the masses are being kept
docile and controlled as there is no thought provocation processes available to
them. By the internet controlling and not presenting a possible two sided
argument, it leaves little room for users to be well educated on topics and
therefore they cannot make informed decisions and opinions. (Halpern, 2011,
pg2,3.)
Is commercialisation destroying the web
or is the web improving the way we do business?
In
the ever evolving world of technology many businesses would be doing themselves
disfavour to not be accessible to their markets in the online world. Most
businesses of today can be found on online platforms with many businesses to
date being solely operated online, for example many online clothing stores. It
is practically essential in the competitive business market of today to at the
very least have a website, email and Facebook for your company. With more
people connected to the internet constantly and the power distance relationship
gap being lessened (overseas purchasing online etc.), it is quite possible for
individuals if they pleased to, to conduct their lives and live online
permanently. However it does create a complex and a lack in social
interactivity. Soon enough we will be dealing with computers more than dealing
with humans face to face. Examples of these are becoming increasingly present
all throughout the society of today, a key example would be the ‘self
check-outs’ that you can find at leading super markets.
Does internet advertising really
influence us?
I guess in many ways internet advertising does
affect individuals to some degree, I think it just depends on whether
individuals are active or latent towards it. Although a majority of the time
there is a negative stigma that goes along with internet advertising and
products purchased on the internet, because you can’t see what you are
purchasing and you can’t determine whether if it is an adequate product or even
a real product. However, with the boom of online shopping and online trading,
purchasing and the advertisement of products on the internet has become more of
the norm practice and has become more reliable in the past five years. I think
as more people are using the internet it is easier and cheaper for companies to
access them through online advertisement and spam as opposed to expensive
billboards and television commercials.
Article
Reference;